Put differently. Let's say that I'm arguing that Taco Bell is the best restaurant in the world. I would have three sub-arguments:
1) Their food tastes good
2) Their food is inexpensive
3) Their food is nutritional
4) Taco Bell combines 1-3 better than any other restaurant int the world
[B/C] would look like: Taco Bell's food is often ranked by surveys in the top two percent in terms of its tastiness. [C] Overwhelmingly, people prefer its tacos and burritos to competitors' burgers and fries. [C] Patrons' written results often stated that Taco Bell's Seven Layer Burrito is simply the best fast food item they ever tasted.
1) Their food tastes good
2) Their food is inexpensive
3) Their food is nutritional
4) Taco Bell combines 1-3 better than any other restaurant int the world
[B/C] would look like: Taco Bell's food is often ranked by surveys in the top two percent in terms of its tastiness. [C] Overwhelmingly, people prefer its tacos and burritos to competitors' burgers and fries. [C] Patrons' written results often stated that Taco Bell's Seven Layer Burrito is simply the best fast food item they ever tasted.
